mostraligabue
» » Systematic Job Evaluation and Comparable Worth

ePub Systematic Job Evaluation and Comparable Worth download

by Dov Elizur

ePub Systematic Job Evaluation and Comparable Worth download
Author:
Dov Elizur
ISBN13:
978-0566051135
ISBN:
0566051133
Language:
Publisher:
Gower Pub Co (September 1, 1986)
Category:
Subcategory:
Human Resources
ePub file:
1942 kb
Fb2 file:
1163 kb
Other formats:
mbr lit azw txt
Rating:
4.2
Votes:
355

Systematic Job Evaluat.

Systematic Job Evaluat.

Discover Book Depository's huge selection of Dov Elizur books online. Systematic Job Evaluation and Comparative Worth. Free delivery worldwide on over 20 million titles.

Job evaluation is a traditional tool used by companies to assist in the process of determining pay structures that can be. .Keywords: comparable worth, job evaluation, gender pay discrimination. Título: ISOS: Sistema de valoración de puestos de trabajo para llevar a la práctica

Job evaluation is a traditional tool used by companies to assist in the process of determining pay structures that can be also useful to detect and combat wage discrimination, since allow determining whether two jobs are of comparable worth or not. Although there are many kinds of systems, authors agree when defining point factor methods as the most appropriate and fair job evaluation systems. Título: ISOS: Sistema de valoración de puestos de trabajo para llevar a la práctica. el principio de igualdad retributiva.

Health Program Planning and Evaluation: A Practical, Systematic Approach for Community Health by L. Michele Issel .

Therefore, different job evaluation systems and different job evaluators are likely to assign different rankings to the same .

Therefore, different job evaluation systems and different job evaluators are likely to assign different rankings to the same set of occupations. Most economists would agree that the outcome is not likely to be efficient, since the procedure cannot incorporate the myriad factors that influence supply and demand in the market. One need only consider the economies of Eastern Europe to observe the results of replacing the market with administered and planned systems. The imposition of comparable worth would likely raise pay in traditionally female jobs; appointing persons favorable to the concept.

A job evaluation is a systematic way of determining the value/worth of a job in relation to other jobs in an organization. It tries to make a systematic comparison between jobs to assess their relative worth for the purpose of establishing a rational pay structure. Job evaluation needs to be differentiated from job analysis.

Keywords: comparable worth, job evaluation, gender pay discrimination. discrimination and to embed it in a computer tool which had to be used by people. ISOS: A job evaluation system to implement comparable worth Albert Corominas. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.

Examining How Job Content is Operationally Defined in Three Job Evaluation Systems Summary and Recommendations Appendices Selected Bibliography Index. Related books and articles. It has long been understood that there are substantial earnings differentials between men and women in the United States.

Comparable worth is a . doctrine that supports solutions for any undervaluation of women’s jobs

Comparable worth is a . doctrine that supports solutions for any undervaluation of women’s jobs. In fact, according to An Experimental Study of Job Evaluation and Comparable Worth, the notion of comparable worth is based on the premise that the market wage does not appropriately measure the value of a job (Arnault, Gordon, Jones, and Phillips, 2001, p. 811).

Implementation of comparable worth further requires that inherent job worth be measured with reasonable accuracy. This paper reports the results of an experimental study of comparable worth. Three commercial job evaluation firms rated the same set of 27 jobs in an actual company. Statistical analysis of the experimental data indicates that the three evaluators differed in which job trait, or constellation of traits, they used to evaluate inherent job worth, implying that at least one of them failed to measure inherent job worth accurately