mostraligabue
» » Did Adam and Eve Have Navels?: Discourses on Reflexology, Numerology, Urine Therapy, and Other Dubious Subjects

ePub Did Adam and Eve Have Navels?: Discourses on Reflexology, Numerology, Urine Therapy, and Other Dubious Subjects download

by Martin Gardner

ePub Did Adam and Eve Have Navels?: Discourses on Reflexology, Numerology, Urine Therapy, and Other Dubious Subjects download
Author:
Martin Gardner
ISBN13:
978-0393049633
ISBN:
0393049639
Language:
Publisher:
W W Norton & Co Inc; 1st edition (October 2000)
Category:
Subcategory:
Trivia & Fun Facts
ePub file:
1268 kb
Fb2 file:
1927 kb
Other formats:
lit lrf lit txt
Rating:
4.4
Votes:
671

Scientific gadfly Martin Gardner asks the questions that make believers of all types cringe. Did Adam and Eve Have Navels? is one such example and is the title and lead essay from this collection of his columns from Skeptical Inquirer

Scientific gadfly Martin Gardner asks the questions that make believers of all types cringe. Did Adam and Eve Have Navels? is one such example and is the title and lead essay from this collection of his columns from Skeptical Inquirer. While many scientifically minded people find the fundamentalist skepticism of Gardner, the Amazing Randi, and their ilk to be a bit straining, the skeptics' voices are relatively quiet compared with the hordes of pseudo- and anti-scientific hucksters scoring political points and big bucks by exploiting ignorance and credulity

Gardner, Martin, 1914-2010.

Gardner, Martin, 1914-2010. Books for People with Print Disabilities. Internet Archive Books. Uploaded by sf-loadersive. org on November 18, 2010. SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata).

If you don't want to include your own Regional Library in your.

Discourses On Reflexology, Numerology, Urine Therapy, And Other Dubious Subjects".

Full title: "Did Adam And Eve Have Navels? Discourses On Reflexology, Numerology, Urine Therapy, And Other Dubious Subjects".

If Adam and Eve did not have navels, then they were not perfect human beings. On the other hand, if they had navels, then the navels would imply a birth they never experienced. Bruce Felton and Mark Fowler are the authors of The Best, Worst, and Most Unusual (Galahad Books, 1994). In this entertaining reference work, they devote several paragraphs (pp. 146-47) to what they call "the worst theological dispute

Alert if: New Price below.

Martin Gardner is perhaps the wittiest, most devastating unmasker of scientific fraud and .

Martin Gardner is perhaps the wittiest, most devastating unmasker of scientific fraud and intellectual chicanery of our time. Here he muses on topics as diverse as numerology, New Age anthropology, and the late Senator Claiborne Pell's obsession with UFOs, as he mines Americans' seemingly inexhaustible appetite for bad science. Gardner's funny, brilliantly unsettling exposés of reflexology and urine therapy should be required reading for anyone interested in "alternative" medicine. In a world increasingly tilted toward superstition, Did Adam and Eve Have Navels? will give those of us who prize logic and common sense immense solace and inspiration.

Discourses on Reflexology, Numerology, Urine Therapy, and Other .

Discourses on Reflexology, Numerology, Urine Therapy, and Other Dubious Subjects (New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company, 2000). All but one of the chapters in Did Adam and Eve Have Navels? (DA&EHN?), Gardner's fifth anthology of what he considers far-out cases of pseudoscience (p. 1), are reprints of recent articles from his column Notes of a Fringe Watcher, a regular feature of Skeptical Inquirer. The title alone of the book under discussion lets us know that Gardner cannot help but take a few cheap shots at that lunatic fringe sect known as fundamentalist Christianity.

Did Adam and Eve Have Navels? (W. Norton, 2000, 11 + 333 pages) is subtitled "Discourses on Reflexology, Numerology, Urine Therapy, and Other Dubious Subjects.

I find it difficult to speak temperately about Martin Gardner because I owe him so much.

- Did Adam and Eve Have Navels? Discourses on Reflexology, Numerology, Urine Therapy and Other Dubious Subjects By Martin Gardner . I find it difficult to speak temperately about Martin Gardner because I owe him so much. As a child in England, my keenest intellectual pleasure was reading Gardner's monthly "Mathematical Games" column in Scientific American.

A master debunker of scientific fraud and psuedo-science takes on numerology, Freud's dream theory, reflexology, and the Heaven's Gate cult, among other assaults on reason and rational thought.
  • Yep, there are alot of inane and archaic beliefs out there. And they sure could use debunking, but you won't find that debunking here. I'm two thirds through this book and the author hasn't even attempted a head on debunking of any of the foolish misconceptions ... NOT ONE.

    This book is clearly a reissue of a previous one by the author. At the end of each chapter he offers an "addendum" to update things since his last writing. But in neither the chapters themselves, nor the addendums, does he actually take on and refute the misconceptions and bizarre, patently absurd beliefs that he describes in repetitive droning detail.

    Instead, he continually, almost obsessively, references other books and past articles from the preceding three or four decades which one presumes refute the misconceptions in detail; but never once does he himself infact define the actual scientific objections, or provide any evidence in refutation. AND THATS WHAT I BOUGHT THE BOOK FOR!!! I didn't buy it as a bibliography of sources for refutation.

    I found this book tiresome, not particularly amusing, of little entertainment value, and largely uninformative. Frankly, it comes across as a cheap attempt at an extra payday by just republishing his prior writings with an add-on update.

    Save your $3 - $4 plus shipping. If you want to be bored, I'd let you have my copy for free for $2.00 postage.

  • After romping through 27 essays (many really extended book reviews) about subjects as various as the End of the World in 2000, intelligent design (the antievolutionary version), conjurors, ufology, Freudianism, crazy congressmen and more, the inimitable Martin Gardner sort of spoils things by getting serious in his 28th and concluding essay on the limits, if any, of knowledge.

    Come now. The kinds of nitwits who believe that, say, Carlos Casteneda really knew a shapeshifting shaman are never going to change their minds because they are exposed to a critical takedown, even by as skilled a wrestler with the nutty as Gardner. To treat these exposes as serious grappling with the ignorant enemy misses the point.

    Their only genuine purpose is to give us smart people a good laugh. And laugh we do. Our motives are not any purer than our ancestors who visited Bedlam to laugh at the lunatics or Barnum & Bailey's sideshow to marvel at the freaks.

    It may make the more sensitive uncomfortable, but the zanies and morons Gardner skewers so deftly were asking for it. Nobody made them sit down and write 900-page books predicting New York would be destroyed in 1994.

    I thoroughly enjoyed these essays when they came out in Skeptical Inquirer over the years and was additionally amused by the Addenda Gardner apends about the reactions to his jibes.

    But despite Gardner's 60 years of exposing crackpots, the density of crackpottery has not diminished one bit.

  • Martin Gardner chronicles human folly in his magazine columns and this book is a collection of his recent work. Each chapter is freestanding, representing a recent column, with the author's updated thinking on the subject at the end of the chapter. The columns are grouped by general subject matter. In each chapter, Gardner lampoons some error in human thinking, effectively revealing the errors during the column and then moving on to another foible in the next segment.
    This is pleasant, entertaining reading and will revive the skeptic in each reader. Fortunately for Gardner, the list of human intellectual errors is a long one, allowing Gardner the comfort of endless material from which to select for future subject matter.
    In short, a very entertaining book.

  • Almost 100% perfect copy.

  • Seemingly disjointed but still a good read.

  • I purchased this book to get a glimps of the athiest point of view. And what can I say? Hmm well, "Screwy Louie had a skewed view do U 2?" And it takes more faith to believe we are descendent from apes than it does to believe in intelligent design. And more and more proof comes in daily.

  • This book will delight almost anyone who sees the value

    of skepticism, but some of the essays (e.g. the one on

    cannibalism) will perhaps even move "minds set in concrete".

    Arthur C Clarke sums it up rightly: This should be a

    must read in schools and in the Congress.

  • It's all an opinion. Wouldn't recommend.