mostraligabue
» » Psychological Science in the Courtroom: Consensus and Controversy

ePub Psychological Science in the Courtroom: Consensus and Controversy download

by Jennifer L. Skeem,Kevin S. Douglas,Scott O. Lilienfeld

ePub Psychological Science in the Courtroom: Consensus and Controversy download
Author:
Jennifer L. Skeem,Kevin S. Douglas,Scott O. Lilienfeld
ISBN13:
978-1606232514
ISBN:
1606232517
Language:
Publisher:
The Guilford Press; 1 edition (May 8, 2009)
Category:
Subcategory:
Medicine
ePub file:
1459 kb
Fb2 file:
1503 kb
Other formats:
docx azw mobi txt
Rating:
4.3
Votes:
179

Kevin S. Douglas, LLB, PhD, is Associate Professor and Coordinator of the Law and Forensic Psychology Program in the Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Canada.

ISBN-13: 978-1606232514. Kevin S.

ISBN 978-1-606-23251-4.

Lilienfeld was born on December 23, 1960 to Ralph and Thelma Lilienfeld of New York, . Growing up, he was interested in paleontology and astronomy, but decided to study psychology after a high school course, then later a few college courses, piqued his interest. He has stated: "Although my love for natural science never waned, I eventually fell in love with the mysteries of the internal world - the human mind - even more than those of the external world. ISBN 978-1-606-23251-4.

Consensus and Controversy. 6. Techniques and Controversies in the Interrogation of Suspects: The Artful Practice versus the Scientific Study, Allison D. Redlich and Christian A. Meissner

Consensus and Controversy. Meissner. 7. Reliability of Child Witnesses' Reports, Maggie Bruck and Stephen J. Ceci. III. Specific Tests and Techniques. 8. The Psychopathy Checklist in the Courtroom: Consensus and Controversies, John F. Edens, Jennifer L. Skeem, and Patrick J. Kennealy.

Be the first to ask a question about Psychological Science in the Courtroom.

The goal is to help professionals and students differentiate between supported and unsupported psychological techniques-and steer clear of those that may be misleading or legally inadmissible. Be the first to ask a question about Psychological Science in the Courtroom. Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia.

Jennifer L. Skeem, Kevin S. Douglas, Scott O. Lilienfeld. Dr. Lilienfeld is a fellow of the American Psychological Society and a recipient of the David Shakow Early Career Award from Division 12 (Clinical Psychology) of the American Psychological Association

Jennifer L. Lilienfeld is a fellow of the American Psychological Society and a recipient of the David Shakow Early Career Award from Division 12 (Clinical Psychology) of the American Psychological Association.

Expert testimony regarding eyewitness identification, Brian Cutler & Gary Wells Techniques and controversies in the interrogation of suspects : the artful practice versus the scientific study, Allison Redlich & Christian Meissner Reliability of child witnesses' reports, Maggie Bruck & Stephen Ceci The psychopathy checklist in the courtroom : consensus and controversies John Edens, Jennifer Skeem & Patrick Kennealey Projective techniques in the courtroom, James Wood.

Rodney Schmaltz, Scott O. Lilienfeld, Nancy J. Woolf, Steven Lynn . Seeing Both Sides: Classic Controversies in Abnormal Psychology (Psychology Series).

book by Scott O. Rodney Schmaltz, Scott O. Woolf, Steven Lynn, Kenneth M. Cramer, Laura L. Namy.

and Social Behavior Jennifer L Skeem; Assistant Professor of Psychology Kevin S Douglas; Dr Scott O Lilienfeld.

Associate Professor of Psychology and Social Behavior Jennifer L Skeem; Assistant Professor of Psychology Kevin S Douglas; Dr Scott O Lilienfeld. This button opens a dialog that displays additional images for this product with the option to zoom in or out. Tell us if something is incorrect. The goal is to help professionals and students differentiate between supported and unsupported psychological techniques-and steer clear of those that may be misleading or legally inadmissible.

The Science of Flirting: Being a .

The Psychopathy Checklist in the Courtroom: Consensus and Controversies This chapter concerns the . The controversy is whether interpretations of these images are of legal usefulness in the courtroom.

Projective Techniques in the Courtroom Projective techniques are those such as the Rorschach inkblot tests or tests where the subject creates drawings that illustrate their thinking or emotions

This rigorous yet reader-friendly book reviews the state of the science on a broad range of psychological issues commonly encountered in the forensic context. The goal is to help professionals and students differentiate between supported and unsupported psychological techniques--and steer clear of those that may be misleading or legally inadmissible. Leading contributors focus on controversial issues surrounding recovered memories, projective techniques, lie detection, child witnesses, offender rehabilitation, psychopathy, violence risk assessment, and more. With a focus on real-world legal situations, the book offers guidelines for presenting scientific evidence accurately and effectively in courtroom testimony and written reports.