Winner, 1996 Elaine and David Spitz Book Prize for the best book onliberal and democratic theory, Conference for the Study of Political Thought. Series: Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought.

Winner, 1996 Elaine and David Spitz Book Prize for the best book onliberal and democratic theory, Conference for the Study of Political Thought. Paperback: 341 pages. Publisher: The MIT Press (January 22, 1997). ISBN-13: 978-0262691963. Product Dimensions: . x . inches.

Winner, 1994 First Book Prize, Foundations of Political Thought Organized Section, American Political Science Association. The core issue is whether or not society can offer its citizens welfare-state guarantees and still preserve the liberal vision of a norm-based legal system.

William E. Scheuerman. Seyla Benhabib, Harvard University Winner,1996 Elaine and David Spitz Book Prize for the best book on liberal and democratic theory, Conference for the Study of Political Thought. Winner, 1994 First Book Prize, Foundations of Political Thought Organized Section, American Political Science Association.

This books ( Between The Norm And The Exception (Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought): The Frankfurt School and the Rule of Law ) Made by William E. Scheuerman About Books Winner, 1996 Elaine and David Spitz Book Prize for the best book. Scheuerman About Books Winner, 1996 Elaine and David Spitz Book Prize for the best book onliberal and democratic theory, Conference for the Study of PoliticalThought. Winner, 1994 First Book Prize, Foundations of PoliticalThought Organized Section, American Political Science Association.

Winner, 1996 Elaine and David Spitz Book Prize for the best book onliberal and democratic theory, Conference for the Study of PoliticalThought. Between the Norm and the Exception : The Frankfurt School and the Rule of Law. by William E.

Between the Norm and the Exception: The Frankfurt School and the Rule of La.

Between the Norm and the Exception: The Frankfurt School and the Rule of Law. Article. In this paper I note the growth of analyses of law that focus upon its ideological character and content, and I identify problems and difficulties manifest in the ideological analysis in recent critical and Marxist texts. The paper argues that work focusing upon the ideological character of law realizes significant advances over that produced by the more orthodox approaches within the sociology of law and jurisprudence employing normative analysis. It is possible to make ideological analysis more rigorous.

A comparative study of the Austrian and the American Constitution. Between the Norm and the Exception: The Frankfurt School and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: MIT Press.

It is argued that Kelsen’s legal thought has enduring import in the present-day crisis of constitutionalism not only for the legal understanding of multi-level government (monism v. dualism) but also for the globalization of constitutionalism and the idea of open-ended constitutionalism. A comparative study of the Austrian and the American Constitution. Journal of Politics 4 (2): 183–200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar.